Fed Cuts Rate -- What will the Stock
Market Do Now?
By Chris Ciovacco
September 19, 2007
This month we have a special
article by Chris Ciovacco the
Chief Investment Officer for Ciovacco Capital Management, LLC.
with the recent rate cuts by the FED I felt this extremely timely and would like to thank Chris for providing us with
this information.
-- Tim McMahon,editor
|
"Developments in financial markets since the Committee’s
last regular meeting have increased the uncertainty
surrounding the economic outlook. The Committee will
continue to assess the effects of these and other
developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to
foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.."
Federal Open Market
Committee, 09/18/2007
|
With the Federal Reserve (Fed) lowering its target
discount rate (interest rate) by 0.50% on September 18, 2007, it is
prudent to examine how stocks behaved in the year following similar
historical rate cuts. I chose to focus on the Fed rate cuts in 1986,
1995, 1998, and 2001 since the current Target Federal Funds Rate
(Fed Funds Rate) of 5.25% (prior to the cut) and the current
published inflation rate of 1.97% are similar to the rates found in
those years. Another factor in choosing to examine the years above
is the market’s expectation of how low the Fed could possibly go
during a lowering cycle is heavily dependent on where rates start
from. For example, prior to the first rate cut in June of 1981, the
Federal Funds Rate was 20.00% and published inflation rate was 8.94%
(full-year 1981). June of 1981 is vastly different from September of
2007. As a result, I see limited value in examining how stocks
behaved after the 1981 cut or other periods which were significantly
different from today. Below is the approximate Fed Funds Rate and
published annual inflation figures for each respective period.

Since
the current Fed Funds Rate of 5.25% (prior to the cut) is lower than
the average of 6.22% in the previous study periods (see TABLE
1 above), the Fed has less room to move rates lower in 2007. The
average number of rate cuts in cycles which began in 1986, 1995,
1998, & 2001 was 5.5 and the total magnitude of those cuts averaged
1.97%. Since PE ratios were off the charts in 2001, I also feel
1986, 1995, and 1998 offer better comparisons to the current
environment. If you remove 2001, the average number of cuts in the
cycles which began in 1986, 1995, 1998 was 3.0 and the average total
magnitude of those cuts was 0.79%. Unless housing drags down the
economy more than is expected (which could happen), I think it will
be difficult for the Fed to lower rates by more than 2.00% over this
cycle given current oil prices and general inflation climate.
However, the 0.50% cut on September 18, 2007 says the Fed may have
put inflation concerns on the back burner and on low heat. To get a
better idea of how Fed rate cuts could impact stocks, we’ll examine
the historical results with and without 2001. Some figures for all
nine rate cutting cycles since 1970 are also presented.
Chart 1 Probability of Stock
Market gains After a FED Rate cut (without 2001)

Chart 2 Probability of Stock
Market gains After a FED Rate cut (with 2001)

What are the odds (based on the historical
periods studied) that stocks will be higher a year from now?
CHART 1 and CHART 2 above show that
the results are encouraging, but they also show it may be rough for
a few weeks or months before stocks can hold on to some meaningful
gains. In all cases (with and without 2001), stocks were lower two
weeks after the first rate cut.
As shown in CHART 1 and CHART
2, the probability of success improves significantly in the third
week after the first rate cut. This means, based on history, we
should be in no big hurry to move more money into stocks. It may be
a good time to consider adding to our stock exposure during the
third week after the cuts (after the initial euphoria wears off and
if conditions warrant).
CHART 3, below, shows the average
daily change of a hypothetical $100,000 stock portfolio after the
first rate cut for both sets of data (with and without 2001). It
gives us similar information to CHARTS 1 and 2, but with much more
detail in terms of the timing of positive and negative outcomes for
stocks during the first year after the first rate cut.

After the FED's rate cuts in 1986, 1995, and 1998, it
took the stock market an average of 66 calendar days for the market
to move permanently higher than the closing level on the day
of the first rate cut.
The average is
somewhat deceptive, however, since the number of calendar days was
170 in 1986, 13 in 1995, and 16 in 1998.
If
we don’t end up looking like 2001(CHART
7) , there is a 66% chance
the market will move permanently higher,
within approximately 14 or 15 calendar days, relative to the closing
price on the day of the first rate cut (1,519 on the S&P 500 in the
Sept 2007 case). Moving above the level found on the day of the cut
does not ensure longer-term success since the market began to head
toward new bear market lows roughly one month after the first rate
cut on January 3, 2001.
Therefore, based on
these four cases, it would be a positive sign if the market made a
new high, relative to the closing level on the day of the first cut,
sometime 30 calendar days after the rate cut.
Said another way,
since the S&P 500 closed at 1519 on September 18,2007 it would be
positive for stocks if the S&P makes a new high after October
19,2007. This would increase the odds that we are not entering a
period like 2001.
The S&P 500 was 27.31% higher one
year after the first Fed rate cut in July of 1986 (CHART 4 below).

The S&P 500 was 18.67%
higher one year after the first Fed rate cut in July of 1995 (CHART
5 below).

The S&P
500 was 20.91% higher one year after the first Fed rate cut in Sept
1998 (CHART 6 below).

The S&P
500 was 13.52% lower one year after the first Fed rate cut in Jan
2001 (CHART 7 below).

After some initial positive reactions by investors, a negative
reaction in the coming days to the rate cut would not be a big
surprise. For example, using the four cases, the average loss on the
day after the cut (September 19, 2007 in our case) was -1.46%. Only
in 1995 was the market able to post positive results (0.43%) on the
first full trading day after the Fed cut.
75% chance stocks will be higher
What does it mean for our investments? We know the odds favor a
positive outcome for stocks over the next 12 months, possibly after
a period of weakness. CHART 7 above also illustrates
a rate cut alone does not guarantee success after 12 months.
|
|
|
The average gain for the S&P 500 one year after the first
rate cut for all four periods was 13.34%.
The average gain for the S&P 500 one year after the first
rate cut if you remove 2001 was 22.30%.
The only instance where the
S&P 500 was lower one year after the first Fed rate cut was
in January of 2001. Where it decreased by 13.52%.
While a Fed rate cut is only one of many factors that will
influence stocks over the next 12 months, it is one of the
most important in the eyes of Wall Street. |
In very simple terms, based on these four historical cases, which
are similar to today’s
environment, there is a 75% chance stocks will be higher a year from
September 18, 2007. This does not call for blind optimism, but it
does call for controlled optimism.
1970-2007: Some Other Rate Cut Facts
Since 1970, the S&P 500 has risen by an average of
5.5% in the three months after the Fed’s first rate cut. Only twice
in the nine instances (22% of the time) since 1970 did stocks lose
ground, including an 18% fall after the first cut in 2001. The
average gain after the nine cuts since 1970 over the next six months
was 12.3% (Source: Barron’s). If we use these nine rate reduction
cycles, the odds of a successful outcome over the next three months
is roughly 88%.
Since monetary inflation via credit expansion is a
key element in our investment strategy, this recent move by the Fed
should be beneficial to our portfolios. All risk assets, as well as
gold and silver, should benefit from lower borrowing costs and
continued expansion of the money supply.
Chris Ciovacco
Ciovacco
Capital Management

Chris
Ciovacco is the Chief Investment Officer for Ciovacco Capital
Management, LLC. More on the web at
www.ciovaccocapital.com
All material presented herein is believed to be
reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Investment
recommendations may change and readers are urged to check with their
investment counselors and tax advisors before making any investment
decisions. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without
prior notice. This memorandum is based on information available to
the public. No representation is made that it is accurate or
complete. This memorandum is not an offer to buy or sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned.
The investments discussed or recommended in this report may be
unsuitable for investors depending on their specific investment
objectives and financial position. Past performance is not
necessarily a guide to future performance. The price or value of the
investments to which this report relates, either directly or
indirectly, may fall or rise against the interest of investors. All
prices and yields contained in this report are subject to change
without notice. This information is based on hypothetical
assumptions and is intended for illustrative purposes only. THERE
ARE NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ACCURACY,
COMPLETENESS, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED IN
THIS ARTICLE. PAST PERFORMANCE DOES NOT GUARANTEE FUTURE RESULTS.
Subscribe to
our FREE monthly E-zine and keep up with the latest Trends and
Inflation information. And receive a Free copy of "15
Ways to Beat 95% of Investors".
Return to Articles Home Page
TOPIC:
Historical Effect Of Fed Interest Rate Cuts On The Stock Market
|